![]() Unfortunately it’s a bit expensive and, similar to Microsoft Teams, not straightforward for external users to jump into a call. SlackĪs well as being a great home for custom emojis and witty GIFs, we’ve found Slack‘s collaborative tools to be rather good too. Sadly it requires Google accounts to access, making this unsuitable for general use. It gets straight to the point with an easy-to-share URL for a browser-based video call with minimal feature clutter (the audio transcription feature is a nice touch). Google Meetĭespite being a significant improvement over Hangouts, Google Meet is still somewhat disappointing. For us however it’s another heavy app with too much overhead. If the organisation is already heavily embedded in the vendor’s ecosystem, perhaps it’s worth using existing licenses as much as possible. Cisco WebExĬisco WebEx falls into the same category for us as Microsoft Teams. #Highfive video chat full#Microsoft Teams is cumbersome and unintuitive, full of admin and features that we would never use-we only want the video calls! And it’s a whole lot of effort for everyone involved to integrate an external user for that reason alone. And when we were able to connect, the call quality wasn’t great. We encountered more problems than anticipated when trying to use Skype, mostly around conflicts between Skype vs. Similar to GoToMeeting, BlueJeans isn’t terrible, just another heavyweight app that is very keen for you to use their desktop client. As well as looking a little outdated, we also didn’t like being pushed to use the desktop client. GoToMeeting is a respectable option, but in our experience has been a bit unreliable and resource intensive. But they have a long history of security flaws, privacy issues, dark patterns, questionable features, and misleading statements about encryption, so we ruled them out. It’s easy to use, reliable, and has a bunch of fun features (virtual backgrounds almost became our 6th requirement…). Zoom is the default video conferencing tool and it’s no wonder. In the end we found some excellent options, but let’s address the main players that we avoided first. … but the process took longer than expected, a good couple of days researching and testing. Lightweight (quick to setup and not cluttered with unnecessary features).Easy access (web-based, no sign-up, ideally with dial-in capabilities in case of internet connection issues).After dissatisfaction with our first few meetings, we did the only sensible thing-trial as many video conferencing apps as we could, and it turns out there are a lot. We had assumed that since video conferencing has been around for a long time, there would be an obvious choice for us to adopt. #Highfive video chat software#As a software company it’s been relatively straightforward for us to migrate to the virtual world, with one exception: video conferencing. Like most companies during lockdown we’ve transitioned to 100% remote working. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |